Anthony P. Keyter vs. The Boeing Company

Home Synopsis of Case Court Cases Overview Press Releases Selected Correspondence

Pertinent Cases:

Terrorism & Murder Case • USA vs Obama and Cabinet • USA vs US Supreme Court Justices • USA vs 111th Congress • USA v. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller • USA v. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators • USA v. 110th Congress • Keyter v. George W. Bush • Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller • Keyter v. The Boeing Company • Keyter v. 230 Government Officers

"The Defendant has in conscious, willful, and malicious violation of its common law duties to the Plaintiff engaged in conduct which caused, and continues to cause, the Plaintiff harm, loss, hardship, and anguish. That conduct included, but is not limited to: maliciously and willfully conspiring with others against the life of the Plaintiff....".

Extract from the 'Complaint' against the Boeing Company.

Civil Case

Anthony P. Keyter vs. the Boeing Company

Plaintiff Anthony P. Keyter was an employee of The Boeing Company for nearly 17 years from July 1989 to March 2006. Plaintiff held the position of Senior Instructor Pilot and Manager with the company, and enjoyed the esteem of The Boeing Company in that professional position. As such plaintiff represented the company on worldwide assignments. As Senior Instructor Pilot for the Boeing Company, plaintiff was qualified to fly all Boeing aircraft in recent production, including B737, B747, B757, B767, and B777 aircraft. Plaintiff is also a Member of the Society for Experimental Test Pilots and holds a Masters Degree in space science from the University of Houston, and a Bachelors Degree in quantum physics and astronomy from the University of South Africa. Plaintiff brought this civil action for damages against the Boeing Company for harm and loss caused by reckless disregard of its common law and statutory duties towards plaintiff arising from a criminal conspiracy by company executives and directors, and senior US Government Officials, to kidnap and murder plaintiff - one group performing one part of the criminal act, the other group performing another part of the act. Plaintiff suffered defamation, wrongful dismissal, physical and financial hardship and strain, and acute mental and emotional anguish due to the innumerable criminal acts and common law violations. Plaintiff has suffered two attempts upon his life and the torment of imminent further attempts from an ongoing murder plot in order to silence him as key witness to crimes committed by Boeing Company and US Government Officials. (See link: 'Synopsis of the Case'). Those crimes have yet to be addressed or the criminals apprehended.

Corruption in the Case

US District Court
Four motions were filed in the US District Court as presented under 'selected documents' below. The presiding judge in the case, Judge Richard A. Jones, simply ignored the urgent motions and committed an array of criminal acts in conducting the case. When criminal charges were filed against the judge for his illegal actions, he summarily and illegally dismissed the case before the defendant even had time to plead in response to the Complaint. Judge Jones:

Willfully failed to address the motions filed in the case.
Willfully failed to appoint a prosecutor pursuant his judicial duties.
Willfully neglected to arrest Boeing Company officials involved in the criminal conspiracy, pursuant his duties under 18USC3041 and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules 4 and 41.
Willfully neglected to compel the defendant, as public company, to obey the laws which it is in continual breach of. In particular, to obey the laws pertaining to Securities Exchange Regulations requiring the company to report to investors, all material irregularities which will affect its stock price - for instance, the imminent arrest of its corporate officers and directors.
Conspired with the Clerk of the Court, the Chief Judge, and almost certainly the defendant in the case, to illegally remove evidence from the court records in violation of 18USC1506. The defendant is the beneficiary of these illegal actions in each case. Whilst some documents were returned to the record after assistance was sought from President Obama and Congress, yet others were not returned.
Denied the plaintiff ‘due process’ in the case – that is, the process laid down by the Constitution, the laws, Federal Rules of Procedure, and court rules.
Denied the plaintiff protection of the laws in violation of 18USC242 - the laws that protect against kidnap and murder and against a litany of other serious felonies committed by the defendant’s officers and their co-conspirators, as documented in the ‘Dossier of Crimes’ .
Conspired with the Clerk of the Court, the Chief Judge, and almost certainly with the defendant, against the legal rights of the plaintiff, in violation of 18USC241
As judicial officer engaged in the court’s official transactions, demonstrated contempt for the rules and the laws, and resistance to the court’s lawful process, in violation of 18USC401.
Willfully failed to recuse himself in violation of 28USC144 and 28USC455.
Corruptly threatened the Plaintiff.
Dismissed the case without having legal jurisdiction in the matter.

The illegal dismissal was appealed directly to the US Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction and for illegality and denial of due process. A 'Combined Appeal' addressed three closely related cases against Boeing, Ford, and Air India Companies - all three being simultaneously and illegitimately dismissed from the District Court by Judge Jones.

US Supreme Court
The obstruction to the normal course of justice and denial of 'due process' advanced uninterruptedly into the US Supreme Court. In their turn, the Supreme Court Justices lent their considerable (but corrupt) power to further protect the three companies, their officers, and their co-conspirators (including the District Court judge), from civil and criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court Justices:

Corruptly refused to docket the combined Appeal Case on four separate occasions. The Supreme Court presented blatantly dishonest and fraudulent reasons for failing to file the Appeal Case.
Criminally neglected to address the crimes of the defendant’s officers and those of their co-conspirators (and of the delinquent District Court judge), as demanded by 18USC3041 and the Federal Rules of Procedure. Those charges were filed with the Appeal Brief in the case.
Criminally neglected to address the seditious conspiracy underpinning the three cases against Boeing, Ford, and Air India. The subversive activities are concisely documented in the criminal complaint in the case “United States of America vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators” initiallyfiled with the Supreme Court on May 23, 2008, and refilled with the combined Appeal. Although obstructed, this criminal case remains pending in the Supreme Court.
Criminally neglected to attend to the large parcel of crimes placed before it in the ‘Dossier of Crimes’, including crimes of attempted kidnap and murder, sedition and treason against the United States, and insurrection against its laws.
Denied plaintiff due process and protection of the laws, in violation of the US Constitution and the criminal statutes.

It must be noted that the Justices of the US Supreme Court are defendants in the criminal case "United States of America vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators", which was re-filed in the Supreme Court together with the Boeing/Ford/Air India Appeal Case. As a matter of impartiality and of law the institution of the Supreme Court is compelled to appoint judges who are not involved in the broad seditious conspiracy, to arbitrate in the Appeal.

Criminal charges were filed against the Supreme Court Justices (with President Obama and Cabinet and with Congress) for contempt of court, denial of due process, and for conspiring with the defendants in the Boeing/Ford/ Air India Appeal Case, to violate the law. The President and Congress were requested to deal with the lawless impasse in the Supreme Court - pursuant the President's Constitutional duties to "take care that the laws are faithfully executed"; and according to Congressional oversight duties over the federal courts. However, in criminal violation of their duties and the laws, President Obama and Congress willfully neglected to address the criminal charges for the reason that the President and certain Congressmen are also named defendants in the underlying criminal case "United States of America vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators". Thus, President Obama and Congress endeavored to cover up that case, as well as the Boeing/Ford/ Air India Appeal Case, in order to protect the defendants from criminal prosecution.

Pursuant the demands of statutes 18USC4 and 18USC2382, further criminal charges were consequently lodged against President Obama and Congress for deliberately and respectively failing to take care of the faithful execution of the laws and failing to oversee the administration of the laws. These charges were lodged with 620 state and federal institutions tasked with law and order, including the offices of the following institutions of each of the 50 states: Governors, Lt. Governors, Secretaries of State; Attorneys General; State Police; State Superior, Appeals, and Supreme Courts; State Legislatures; US District Courts and US Attorneys.

To no avail. Officials from 620 pertinent institutions of government tasked with law and order criminally abrogated their duties and thwarted the normal course of justice in order to protect law-breaking government officers - and their co-conspirators in the companies Boeing, Ford, and Air India - from prosecution.

Thus, the Combined Appeal Case against Boeing, Ford, and Air India, (although obstructed) remains pending in the United States Supreme Court, together with its criminal counterpart upon which the three civil claims are based, viz.: "United States of America vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators".

Selected Court Documents
[Also see 'PACER' - Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
United States District Court

United States Supreme Court

Selected Correspondence in the Case