Anthony P. Keyter - Court Cases

Home Synopsis of Case Court Cases Overview Press Releases Selected Correspondence

Pertinent Cases:

Terrorism & Murder Case • USA vs Obama and Cabinet • USA vs US Supreme Court Justices • USA vs 111th Congress • USA v. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller • USA v. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators • USA v. 110th Congress • Keyter v. George W. Bush • Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller • Keyter v. The Boeing Company • Keyter v. 230 Government Officers

"From a study of this case, laymen and professionals alike can come to no other conclusion than that the legal system and government serves neither the country nor its populace." - Anthony Keyter addressing Chief Justice Roberts in 'Keyter versus President Bush'.

Court Cases Overview
February 15, 2011

Description

Introduction
In an orgy of lawlessness in the US State and Federal Governments, several thousand politicians, officials, and judges, have embarked upon a major seditious conspiracy to obstruct the administration of the laws, defeat the course of justice, provide protection to known criminals, and to deny the Constitutional rights to due process and protection of the laws. The crimes caused me, Anthony Keyter, harm and loss and accordingly, as they developed, they were reported, first to state officials and later to federal officials. However, every official has assiduously covered up the multiple felonies by their lawbreaking colleagues - thereby violating the criminal statutes themselves. Providing protection to a criminal is a crime, and failure to have a criminal identified is a crime. (Statutes 18USC3, 18USC4, 28USC535, and 18USC1505 amongst others).

Redress in the Court
Protection against the criminal acts of malfeasant officials, and redress for the harm and loss caused by their malevolent actions (or their failure to act where action was due), has in vain been sought in 51 state and federal court cases, both criminal and civil. (See "Lists and Links to Cases" below). Each court case addressed different aspects of the insurrection, and different groupings amongst the seditious conspirators. Every case has been corruptly and illegally dismissed, or denied, without tending to the deluge of crimes filed in the cases and presented to the courts.

Criminal Cases
The United States of America opened several criminal cases to address, in part some of the crimes of some of the conspirators. All these criminal cases were summarily and illegally dismissed from the United States District Courts by corrupt judges. That illegality in the District Courts was in turn wrongfully upheld by the United States Appeals Courts, in order to protect the malfeasant officials implicated from prosecution. Subsequent appeals to the United States Supreme Court were obstructed by the US Supreme Court Justices. Due process of law was denied in the Supreme Court and all evidence of those criminal cases were either removed from the record or simply not filed under whatever false pretense. Although effectively obstructed at this time, the criminal cases remain pending in the US Supreme Court.

Philosophy behind Civil Suits
As a general principle, every act or omission negligently or willfully perpetrated which harms another person constitutes a cause of action in a tort law claim for damages. It follows then that every criminal act or omission which harms another, also gives rise to a civil claim for damages, as the criminal statutes merely reflect societal norms, common law principles and responsibilities. The US Constitution, 14th Amendment, and the statutes 42USC1983 and 42USC1985, make provision for civil restitution for conspiracy against and denial of an individual's rights - in this case the constitutional rights to due process of law, protection of the laws, and ownership of 'de jure' property.

Accordingly, as a result of the failure of the criminal justice system to act against law-breaking officials or to provide that protection of the laws, civil suits for damages were filed against malfeasant officials (and others) who, through their acts/omissions, breached the criminal statutes and thereby caused me harm and loss. Several civil actions have been pursued through various courts via: state superior courts, a state appeals court, and a state supreme court; federal district courts, federal appeal courts, and the US Supreme Court. The courts have ruled on some 220 proceedings, that is, petitions, motions, injunctions, appeals, certioraris, etc. Details thereof and links to some of these cases can be found on this page.

Crime in the Court
In their efforts to counteract and nullify the court cases and to escape civil and criminal liability, the officials/defendants committed further crimes in court. The officials /defendants embarked upon tampering with and theft of court records and incriminating evidence, conspiracy with judges to manipulate court judgments, and a path of malicious intimidation and retaliation against me as primary witness to the crimes of the officials. The 'Dossier of Crimes', which describes and provides prima facie evidence of the crimes of some 15,000 officials, has illegally been removed from several Court Records and from all associated cases filed with the US Supreme Court. Numerous judges are directly involved in the criminality in the courts - including the Chief Justice of the United States, Justice John G. Roberts.

Corruption by the Judges
In some 220 proceedings thus far conducted in both civil and criminal courts, not one judicial decision showed a semblance of justice, not one decision followed the law. In each case corrupt and politically motivated judges joined forces with the seditious conspirators and have, in flagrant violation of the law, dismissed the cases before trial in order to protect lawbreaking government officials. By way of example, judges who became personally implicated in the matter, failed to excuse themselves when circumstances dictated that they do so, thereby violating the laws 28USC144 and 28USC455. Judges fraudulently reconstructed the 'facts' in their findings in order to deliver ostensibly respectable judgments, dismissing the cases as 'frivolous', or as having ‘no jurisdiction', or 'no cause of action'. In the case Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers for instance, presiding district court judge, Charles Lovell, made 47 fraudulent misrepresentations in his ruling to justify dismissing the case. (See details in the links to the case below). In many cases, for instance the cases against President Bush, the 230 Government Officers, and Senator McCain et al., public prosecutors were compelled by law to prosecute the defendants for crimes committed, yet acted as Defense Counsel for the malfeasant officers in the civil suits which were based on those very same crimes - a conflict untenable in law.

Furthermore, every one of the judges implicated failed to address the criminal offenses underlying the civil suits, as well as the offences committed in the courts. Title 18 USC 3041 of the United States Code empowers a judge to act under circumstances where a Complaint, or an affidavit such as the 'Dossier of Crimes', provides probable cause of offenses. Every one of the judges had the power to act and had cognizance of the offenses committed by the conspirators/defendants. Title 18 USC 4 obligates the judges, having knowledge of felonies committed, to act appropriately and 'as soon as possible' regarding those felonies. Rules 4 & 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide regulation for the actions of a judge in this situation. Clear and unambiguous probable cause existed for most of the judges to arrest the defendants in accordance with Federal Court Rules. Yet no action was forthcoming. Every one of the judges criminally neglected his/her statutory duties to administer justice and instead protected the conspirators/defendants and concealed their crimes.

Title 18 USC § 3041 This law states: "For any offense against the United States, the offender may, by any justice or judge of the United States, be arrested and imprisoned or released as provided in chapter 207 of this title, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States as by law has cognizance of the offense."
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure FRCr.P, Rule 4: Rule 4 (a) states: "If the complaint or one or more affidavits filed with the complaint establishes probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and that the defendant committed it, the judge must issue an arrest warrant to an officer authorized to execute it." Rule 4 (c) states: Such warrant must "command that the defendant be arrested and brought without unnecessary delay before a judge".

Moreover, several of the civil courts were requested to compel officials/defendants to obey the law (which they were in breach of) - to compel the malfeasant officials by way of Mandamus to execute their statutory duty regarding the crimes presented to them. Thirteen petitions for Writs of Mandamus were filed with different courts. Successive judges have simply neglected to address these petitions. A petition for a writ of mandamus was filed in the US Supreme Court (case no. 05-140) requesting the Supreme Court to compel President Bush to see to his constitutional duties to take care of the faithful execution of the law where it has broken down with respect to the crimes of this conspiracy. However, that petition was illegally removed from the Court Record before the Justices could deliberate thereon. It was re-filed on six occasions, but illegally removed from the Supreme Court Record on each occasion. Today, not a trace of case no. 05-140 can be found in the Supreme Court Records.

Judge's Motives
One may well ask how could so many of our judges participate in this corrupt endeavor and criminal conspiracy? Firstly, there exists a powerful 'primordial' instinct amongst judges to protect their own; that is, to protect malfeasant colleagues and fellow officials who in turn will protect them from the consequences of any wrongdoing. This is a trait of human nature, which failing is responsible for a large fraction of the crimes committed in this case. In addition, 'the system' in which judges in the United States operate today is absolutely intolerant of ‘betrayal’ in their ranks such as the prosecution of members of their own 'family', no matter what the offenses. As demonstrated in this case, even the serious offenses of attempted kidnap and murder, insurrection, treason, and domestic terrorism, have illegally been swept under the carpet and concealed by judges. There is clearly no moral perfection in a man or woman merely because he/she has assumed the mantle of 'judge'. It can also not be said that our judges are good (moral) and pure, and that in their 'untainted' minds will be found neither corruption nor defilement or malignant bent. No, our judges merely reflect the prevailing consciousness of today's society - its scruples and its ills, which ills are so acutely, yet sadly, demonstrated in this case.

Without exception, each one of the 15,000-plus officials whom I have approached to provide me protection of the laws, and who had the authority and the legal duty to do so, has instead illegally protected lawbreaking officials, and rendered assistance to them to escape criminal culpability. Each one of the judges directly involved in this case has moved to shield the officials from criminal investigation and prosecution - in flagrant violation of their oaths and the laws on insurrection and treason.

Comment

From an assessment of the facts of the case, a reasonable mind can come to no other conclusion than that the corruption demonstrated in this case is not unique, but merely a reflection of endemic corruption throughout all levels of government and the courts across the United States. The paradigm presented herewith demonstrates that in practice the protection of law-breaking officials by colleagues and by the courts is absolute; that government officers who break the law at the expense of the common man are unassailable; that America's 'Constitutional Rights' and protections which are so proudly touted to a cynical world, are in fact most arbitrarily applied by our courts - the US Supreme Court included. The abuse of the common man by those who hold positions of power and authority can, without any fear of contradiction, be termed a 'tyranny' upon the populace of the United States. The facts of this case irrefutably attest thereto.

Links to Details of Court Cases

The subversion, treason, and lawlessness in the US Government and in the courts, is amply demonstrated in the court documents of the 51 court actions listed below. Some documents and summaries of the cases may be accessed through the links provided below. A shortened list of pertinent cases may also be accessed under the heading Court Cases in the menu above. In addition, a fuller set of documents may be accessed for corroboration via PACER on the internet (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). However it must be borne in mind that the seditious conspirators have corruptly removed many incriminating documents from the courts records.

In Re Anthony Keyter, Complaining Witness in Domestic Terrorism Plot