Working in concert with judges of the United States District Court for Western Washington (Seattle), President Obama and Cabinet, Senators and Representatives of the 111th Congress, and the Justices of the US Supreme Court, obstructed justice and the administration of the laws in three civil cases in the Seattle Court against the companies Boeing, Ford, and Air India. Underpinning the cases against the three companies lie foiled kidnap and murder attempts and a seditious conspiracy operating with impunity within the government and the courts of the United States - felonies which Obama, Congress, and the SC Justices wish to conceal due to their ignominious association therewith.

On October 5, 2009, Complaining Witness Anthony P. Keyter lodged three 'Affidavits of Complaining Witness / Criminal Complaints' with the US District Court, Maine, against President Obama and Cabinet, Senators and Representatives of the 111th Congress, and the Justices of the US Supreme Court. The criminal complaints (linked below) relate specifically to their corrupt role in obstructing the legal process of the civil cases against the companies Boeing, Ford, and Air India; and relate more generally, to their leading role in the broad seditious conspiracy within the US Government. The Boeing, Ford and Air India cases explicitly tie the aforementioned officials to the ongoing murder plot aimed at silencing the complainant's testimony in the courts.

Right from the outset of the abovementioned criminal cases, the extreme effort by top officials to cover up the ongoing criminal conspiracy was clearly evident. The US District Court, Maine, responded to the criminal complaints in keeping with a well-established pattern in the federal courts of protecting malfeasant officials from prosecution by any means available, legal or illegal. The US District Court simply opened civil cases under the civil titles and nos. 09-516, 09-517, and 09-518, instead of criminal cases by which to address the criminal complaints. In this way the court could more readily dismiss the civil cases without addressing the crimes, or without dealing with grand juries, or submitting to the peremptory requirements of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The progress of the three cases has been characterized by lawlessness matching that seen in all other court cases (listed on this website) which have fruitlessly sought to address this virulent insurrection against the laws of the United States.

On November 6, 2009, the presiding Magistrate Judge recommended to the presiding District Judge that he dismiss the three cases for "lack of prosecution" by the Complaining Witness.  The District Judge implemented that recommendation on November 17, 2009.   It must be noted that it is not the duty of the Complaining Witness to prosecute, but indeed that of the government.  Those officials who were requested to tend to prosecution in the three cases, but who willfully failed their peremptory duty, are: the President and his Attorney General (who have a duty to take care of the faithful execution of the laws); the Congress (who have oversight duties over the courts); the Justices of the Supreme Court, who have definite responsibilities anent the related criminal charges filed with them - all the aforementioned being defendants in the three cases.

The crux of the matter has clearly been confirmed by the District Court Judge for Maine: government officials will not prosecute the criminal offenses of their colleagues.  That is precisely the point which the Complaining Witness, Anthony Keyter, has made throughout his attempts to tackle the widespread criminal conspiracy within the US Government and the courts.  That conspiracy has the intent to, by force, prevent hinder and delay the faithful execution of the laws of the United States – which is the precise reason why the President and Cabinet, the Congress, and the Supreme Court Justices, are before the courts.

The illegal dismissal was appealed to the 1st Circuit Appeals Court on November 23, 2009.  As anticipated, the Appeals Court judges joined with the judicial corruption and further protected the defendants from prosecution by affirming the illegal judgment of the District Court – again, without addressing the criminal charges against the defendants.  In addition, certain evidence of wrongdoing was illegally removed from the docket and concealed from public view.

On January 6, 2010, three ‘Petitions for Writ of Certiorari’ were filed with the US Supreme Court Clerk, and also directly with the US Chief Justice, to appeal the unlawful dismissal of the three cases. All petitions were returned together with a simple, but deceitful, reply that “the Court is unable to assist in the matter presented” - demonstrating just how easy it is to brazenly conspire against rights, to deny due process of law in the courts, and to get away with that crime, time and time again.  On January 25, 2010, the three petitions were filed for a third time in accordance with the Federal Rules of Procedure, this time with the 8 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court - only to meet with the same fate. The three petitions of appeal were simply never filed on the Supreme Court Record and will thus remain pending until due process is provided.

President Obama and his Cabinet, and the Senators and Representatives of the US Congress, were in turn requested to deal with the corruption in the Supreme Court and to take care that those criminal cases were filed - to no avail.  Being fully aware of the lawlessness, and being obligated under law to act, they have instead joined forces with the supreme corruption in the courts and have thereby ensured to themselves, impunity against prosecution for all wrongdoing.

The criminal conspiracy between the three branches of United States government is thus unequivocally established by the corrupt dealings in the criminal cases against the President and his Cabinet, Congressmen, and the Supreme Court Justices.  The failure of the President, the Attorney General and US Attorneys, Congressmen, the Supreme Court Justices and lower court judges, to appoint a prosecutor to prosecute the offenses of senior government officials, should confirm to all skeptics that in practice:

Generally, law-breaking government officials enjoy impunity and are beyond the reach of the law.

The refusal of the United States Supreme Court to deal with the ‘anarchy’ within the three branches of government corroborates the existence of the sweeping seditious conspiracy and insurrection against the laws, operating with impunity within the government and the courts of the United States.

Some 15,000 state and federal officials (and counting) have in their possession reports and evidence of multiple crimes committed by senior government officials against the United States. Those serious offenses include domestic terrorism, treason, sedition, insurrection against the laws, and conspiracy to kidnap and murder a witness to these crimes. Each official has on multiple occasions been requested to take the appropriate legal action concerning the subversion and the public safety.  Each of the 15,000 or so officials has an individual and collective duty to the public vis-à-vis those offenses; each has sworn an oath before God and the nation to perform that duty; and, without exception, every government officer involved has willfully failed to perform their duty in order to protect law-breaking colleagues from prosecution. And every one of the 15,000 officials so implicated has committed an unmitigated act of treason against the United States of America.

The combined efforts of government officers to obstruct justice in criminal proceedings against law-breaking officials, reveals the utter worthlessness of a just and a fair Constitution in a milieu of pervasive lawlessness within a government and its judiciary.   

The combined efforts of the US Executive, the US Congress, and the US Courts, to protect high ranking officials from criminal prosecution, as demonstrated in these three cases, has produced a violent impact upon society – the violence of a democratically elected government upon its own people. That violence is defined by statute 18USC2331(5) as Domestic Terrorism.