Anthony Peter Keyter

Home      Synopsis of Case      Court Cases Overview      Press Releases      Selected Correspondence

Terrorism & Murder Case    USA vs Obama and Cabinet    USA vs US Supreme Court Justices    USA vs 111th Congress    USA v. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller    USA v. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators    USA v. 110th Congress    Keyter v. George W. Bush    Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales & Mueller    Keyter v. The Boeing Company    Keyter v. 230 Government Officers

"I shall remind you of your oath that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which you have entered, 'So help me God'. As you tend to the choice between treason upon self and fidelity to corrupt friends in high positions, or treason upon dishonorable friends and fidelity to self, to the State, and to the people of this nation, may your actions be premised upon the higher principles of justice, founded in righteousness - So help you God."
- Anthony Keyter addressing Chief Justice Roberts, regarding crimes filed in
'Keyter versus President Bush'.

Terrorism, Murder, and the
International Foiling of Justice

Synopsis of the Case
June 6, 2011

Index

Introduction
United States Milieu
Development of the Case in the United States
Initial Crimes
Exhaustive Measures
Corruption in Government / Judiciary
Misprision / Obstruction / Conspiracy
The Role of United States President George W. Bush
Corruption in the United States Supreme Court
Defeat of Justice
Fraudulent Judgments
Rendering Criminal Assistance
Violation of Laws Disqualifying a Judge
Shielding of Criminal Offenders by Supreme Court Police
Tampering with / Illegal removal of Court Evidence
Retaliation against a Witness
Attempted Kidnap and Murder of a Witness
Ordered by President Bush
Third Party Participation
De Facto Impunity against Arrest
Seditious Conspiracy
The Role of President Obama
Bush Plot Inherited
The Role of the President's Cabinet
Insurrection against the Laws of the United States  
Rebellion
The Role of the Justice Department and FBI
The Role of the Federal Courts
The Role of State Governments and Judiciary of the 50 States
The Role of the United States Armed Forces
The Role of the US Congress
The Role of a Free United States Press
Incestuous Relationship between Branches of the US Government
Treason against the United States
Mass Murder of 158 People
International Terrorism
Terrorism within the United States
Proliferation into the International Arena
The Role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
The Role of the European Union and Council of Europe
The Role of United Nations Officials
The Evidence
Prima Facie Proof
Appeals for Protection of the Laws
Corrupt Court Proceedings
The Dossier of Crimes
Summary
Conclusion
Appendices

Introduction

There is an active international plot afoot to commit acts of violence against citizens of the United States of America and the international community. A number of persons have perpetrated criminal acts to effect the object of the unlawful endeavor, including intimidation, coercion, extortion, tampering with a witness, theft of court record, attempted kidnap, three foiled assassination attempts, and murder of 158 innocent people. There is strong evidence to indicate that further acts of violence are imminent, including the kidnap and murder of a key witness to those crimes.

The plot originated in the United States courts as a seditious conspiracy but has since proliferated and transcended national boundaries in terms of the locale in which the perpetrators operate and seek asylum. Amongst the criminal conspirators from the United States are high-level officials from United States federal and state governments and the courts, and industry officials from the Boeing Company and the Ford Motor Company. Amongst the international criminal conspirators are European Union officials, officials from the Council of Europe and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, officials from the United Nations Organization, and industry officials from Air India. To date there are more than 15,000 known conspirators (mostly from the United States) who are complicit in the pervasive terrorist activities, and/or, who have provided safe haven and passage to the perpetrators.

The objective of the 15,000-strong international conspiracy is to prevent, hinder, and delay, by means of violence, the execution of the laws upon law-breaking officials from the aforementioned countries, corporations, and organizations. The intention is to obstruct the administration of the laws and to defeat the course of justice, to provide protection to known criminals and to deny the fundamental rights of due process and protection of the laws to their victims.

Conspirators from the United States have three times attempted to kidnap and murder a US Supreme Court litigant and key witness to their crimes. Evidence confirms that this murder plot is current and actively pursued. The United States institutions of justice and law enforcement have provided no protection because these institutions are, perversely, led by the very ring-leaders of this international criminal endeavor. Officials from 620 pertinent institutions of the US government tasked with law and order, have abrogated their duties and thwarted the normal course of justice in order to protect law-breaking US government officers from prosecution.

An intense group effort in the top structures of the present and former US Administrations, the US Congress, the Governments of the 50 States, the US Armed Forces, and the Courts, has attempted to conceal the crimes. Their failure to act against the insurgency has furthered the objectives of the conspirators and made it possible for the criminal endeavor to proliferate. Officials from these institutions have thereby breached the statutes and implicated themselves as co-conspirators in the insurrection against the laws of the United States, and as 'accessories after the fact' to the kidnap and murder attempts perpetrated in the United States.

Within this milieu, the murder of 158 people in India is attributable to a group of international conspirators from Air India, the Boeing Company, and the US Government. Exhaustive measures have been taken internationally to instigate justice and pursue restitution, and to animate law enforcement and the judicial processes across the globe to deal with this deluge of lawlessness, but to no avail. None of the heinous crimes have yet been investigated or prosecuted. The criminal violations are ongoing and as an ever widening circle of international government officials become implicated in the cover up of the crimes, the numbers keep escalating. This criminal misconduct by government and industry officials has had a harsh impact upon society and has unleashed a definite brand of tyranny upon America and the international community.

In order to understand the impulsion from which the international terrorist activities originated in the United States of America, and the motives of the initial conspirators in violating the laws and attempting to kidnap and murder a witness, it is essential to understand the broader setting in which those crimes were committed in the United States.

United States Milieu

The founding fathers of America enshrined noble principles in the US Constitution -principles of freedom, justice, and the protection of individual rights. However, in the application of these principles and in the administration of the laws something has gone dreadfully awry. The lofty principles established by the US Constitution have been usurped by officials with more sinister intentions. The United States of today is not the benign society which the founding fathers aspired to create through the higher values enshrined in the US Constitution.

Two sets of standards have developed in the execution of the laws - one set applicable to the general populace, the other applicable to those in authority. US Officials in positions of authority who abuse their positions and violate the law may generally do so with impunity. This has become the norm and there is no effective antidote available to the common man against this phenomenon. The US system of government and certain laws in fact protect such abusers from culpability. This further encourages immoral and corrupt behavior amongst officials.

US Officials who are tasked with administering the laws simply fail to take action against offenders in their midst. This proves to be a most common and effective method to protect a law-breaking peer from prosecution. This collusion amongst officialdom to protect colleagues from criminal and civil accountability is widespread throughout all branches of United States government: executive, legislative, and law enforcement / judiciary. The profound malevolence permeates through every level of government: city, county, state, and federal. The phenomenon translates into a certain brand of tyranny - the tyranny of a democratically elected government wrought upon its own people.

On the face of it this indictment might appear implausible. However, the veracity thereof is amply substantiated by the facts elaborated in a 'Dossier of Crimes', and in thousands of pages of evidential documents surrounding the broader case. The dossier comprises some 2000 pages of prima facie evidence and describes the impunity with which some 15,000 conspirators from the United States (mostly US government officials and co-conspirators from industry) have committed innumerable offenses and have attempted to kidnap and murder a witness to their crimes.

Development of the Case in the United States

Initial Crimes
Every citizen living in the United States has by law, amongst others, the following two inalienable rights - that of lawful ownership of property, and that of equal protection of the laws, viz. US Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1: "... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". Despite these Constitutional protections, my assets were seized and I was stripped of a sizeable portion of my income by illegal government action. (See Dossier of Crimes, Volume I).

Exhaustive Measures
Since January 2002, exhaustive measures have been taken to seek justice and restitution for the initial crimes, and to animate the law enforcement process to deal with a deluge of subsequent crimes amongst officials, but to no avail. In my efforts I have to date made thousands of written requests to some 15,000 US officials - from the most junior police officer to the highest authorities in the land. With every letter I have thought: this one will reach a heart and change a mind. But I woefully underestimated the darkness I had to penetrate.

The numerous written requests for protection and enforcement of the laws were directed to officials from 620 different, but pertinent, institutions of government tasked with law and order. (Appendix 1). These institutions include state and federal police departments, state and federal prosecutors, state and federal judges, legislators, judiciary committees, judicial conduct commissions, ethics boards, bar associations, state and federal attorneys general, and state and federal executives.

Requests for protection and enforcement of the laws were also addressed to the courts. In all, 51 court cases have been filed in state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. (Appendix 2). In the initial cases I sought redress of the illegal seizure of de jure property and in all cases I sought the protection of the law against ongoing harmful criminal acts. These rights are secured to every United States citizen, including me, through the promise of the 5th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution.

The exhaustive measures taken to secure justice are described throughout the 'Dossier of Crimes', described in more than 220 proceedings of the 51 court cases mentioned, and described in other related documents in the hands of various authorities.

Corruption in Government / Judiciary
Prima facie evidence of the crimes committed by government officers was provided to the authorities and to the courts. Each official to whom the crimes were presented had the capacity, the authority, and a statutory duty, to address the crimes. However, every official omitted to perform their legal duties to investigate and prosecute, or to initiate same. In every instance my appeals for justice and protection of the laws were rejected with callous indifference - in favor of a cover up of government and judicial wrongdoing and in protecting the law-breaking officials implicated from prosecution. In every instance my rights, ostensibly protected by the Constitution and the laws, were scorned and my appeals to the authorities were rejected with contempt - many times over. In every one of the 51 interrelated court cases (which addressed different groupings in the criminal conspiracy), the courts not only failed to deal with the deluge of crimes presented to the courts, but actively suppressed the shameful issue.

In this case the cover up of crimes committed by law-breaking officials is absolute. Yet, the case is not unique, but merely a reflection of what happens across the United States, day after day, in court upon court, and in administration upon administration - city, county, state, and federal. In practice, government officers who break the law at the expense of the common man are unassailable. However, providing protection to criminals is a crime and failure to identify them is a crime.

Misprision / Obstruction / Conspiracy
The United States Code statute on Misprision of Felony (18USC4), amongst many other statutes, obligates officials to deal with felonies and other crimes which have been brought to their attention. In this case, officials should either have initiated the investigations or prosecutions on their own volition, or alternatively, they should have passed the information on to somebody in authority who would have addressed the crimes. (28USC535). Each official involved failed to perform that legal duty and violated the statutes on misprision of felony, as well as the requirement to investigate crimes involving government officers.

By the same reasoning, each official obstructed and impeded the due and proper administration of the law and violated the statute on obstruction of justice. (18USC1505). Every official was thus a principal offender due to his own substantive violations of law. By their criminal conduct each official, knowing that offenses against the United States had been committed, assisted other offenders in order to hinder or prevent their apprehension, trial, and punishment, and became accessories after the fact to the crimes of the other offenders. (18USC3).

Each official also furthered the aims of the broad ranging conspiracy to commit offenses, and the conspiracy against rights, and joined in with the objectives to obstruct the course of justice. As a result, each official became a co-conspirator in the crimes of the other offenders. Thus a staggering number of crimes have been documented according to the dictates of the law.

Yet, the initial crimes cannot be disputed. The laws are clear and have not been obeyed. Unimpeachable evidence of numerous felonies is provided in the 'Dossier of Crimes'. For instance, burglary has been confessed to under oath by the perpetrator; perjury is clearly discernable in conflicting statements under oath; a judge acknowledges (in court transcripts) the illegal removal of crucial court evidence - tampering with evidence. Other serious crimes associated with this criminal conspiracy include: Fraud; Theft; Official Misconduct; Rendering Criminal Assistance; Conspiracy against Rights; Conspiracy to Commit Offense; Tampering with a Witness; Retaliation against a Witness with intent to kill; and Attempted Kidnap with intent to kill.

Details and prima facie evidence of the crimes committed by the approximately 15,000 conspirators from the US (provided in the 2000 pages of the 'Dossier of Crimes'), have been presented to government authorities and the courts on some 700 occasions. No investigations or prosecutions have been conducted on any of these known felonies. The undeniable evidence has also been presented to the US Supreme Court on some 20 occasions, but on each occasion the conspirators removed those criminal dossiers from the Supreme Court Records.

Perversion of justice can have no clearer and more debased an example. The 15,000 or so US government officials involved in the criminal conspiracy hold pertinent positions in state and federal governments. Amongst state officials are police chiefs, prosecutors, attorneys general, secretaries of state, legislators, and governors. Also included are state judges from all levels of state courts. Amongst federal government officials involved in the criminal conspiracy are FBI agents, US Attorneys General and US Attorneys, federal judges including the Chief Justice, generals and admirals of the Armed Forces, and the present and former President and Vice President of the United States.

The Role of President George W. Bush

When all the available remedies had been exhausted and I nevertheless failed to animate the legal system to deal with the crimes, I addressed myself to President George W. Bush with the request that he see to the faithful execution of the laws in terms of his constitutional duties, viz: "The President ... shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed". (US Constitution, Article II, Section 3).

President Bush was informed of the large scale criminal conspiracy involving government officials and that evidence and investigation of their crimes had been suppressed. He was provided with all the necessary information in order to take appropriate action. (See 66 letters addressed to President Bush). Despite his peremptory duties under the Constitution and the criminal statutes, and despite numerous requests, President Bush willfully failed to take any action at all, but instead elected to join in the cover up of the crimes. This conduct placed the President directly in breach of the criminal statutes, the Constitution, and the common law duties of every citizen.

As a consequence, a civil suit was filed against President Bush for his violations of the criminal statutes and common law, and to seek a court order compelling him to obey the law and the Constitution. This suit met with further criminal behavior in the Federal District Court in D.C. - committed by the President, by his counsel, and by the presiding judge in case no. 03-cv-2496. These crimes are fully described in the appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (case no. 04-5324). In their turn, the Court of Appeal judges failed to deal with the crimes and joined with the endeavor by President Bush and other law-breaking officials to conceal the crimes and in so doing violated the statutes themselves.

Hence an appeal was made to the United States Supreme Court for justice, for, chiseled upon the marble edifice of the Supreme Court are the compelling words: "Equal Justice under Law". Under this auspicious banner 3 initial cases, which pitted the common man against the might of a corrupt American establishment, were presented to the Supreme Court. Those initial Supreme Court cases were:

  1. Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush, Supreme Court Case No. 05-140.
  2. Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers, Supreme Court Case No. 06-284.
  3. Anthony P. Keyter vs. McCain et al., Supreme Court Case No. 06-1069

These cases addressed the criminal neglect of government officials to deal with the deluge of crime within their ranks.

Corruption in the United States Supreme Court

Defeat of Justice
Unsurprisingly however, the criminal endeavor by politicians, judges, and officials, to obstruct the course of justice advanced uninterruptedly into the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court failed to address the corruption in the government and the courts, and failed to attend to a large parcel of crimes placed before it in the 3 initial cases against government officials which were active at that time. In their turn, the Supreme Court Justices lent their considerable (but corrupt) power to advance the aims of the criminal conspirators to obstruct the administration of the laws and to defeat the course of justice. All 3 initial cases were characterized by significant criminality in the court so as to protect President Bush and the other senior government officials from civil and criminal prosecution.

Fraudulent Judgments
In each instance the Certiorari petitions to the Supreme Court were fraudulently and illegally denied without the benefit of all the relevant documentation and without the Justices performing obligatory judicial duties to address the underlying crimes. A Mandamus petition was filed in the case against President Bush requesting a Supreme Court Order to command the President to obey the laws. The Mandamus petition was ostensibly deliberated and then fraudulently denied by the Justices - yet all the copies of the petition had already been stolen from the courthouse within hours of being filed and were never available for deliberation by the Justices.

Rendering Criminal Assistance
The failure of the Supreme Court Justices to act upon evidence of multiple felonies presented in court documents and the criminal dossiers, protected and rendered criminal assistance to known felons. The Justices thereby obstructed the due and proper administration of the laws and violated 18USC1505 and 18USC4. Urgent Motions for Injunction seeking court protection from ongoing crimes in each of the 3 related Supreme Court cases were simply not addressed. This neglect sanctioned further criminal misconduct by officials and violated 18USC3.

Violation of Laws Disqualifying a Judge
Motions for recusal and/or disqualification of the Justices were submitted to the Supreme Court when it became clear that they were colluding in the criminal conspiracy underlying each of the 3 cases. However, the Justices failed to recuse themselves, acted under severe conflict of interest untenable in law, and rendered judgments to dismiss the very cases which implicated them in crime. The Justices thereby shielded themselves from investigation, impeachment, and prosecution. It must be noted that Chief Justice Roberts did in fact recuse himself from 2 of the deliberations, however, on other applicable occasions he did not. The laws governing the recusal of judges expressly prohibit acting under such conflict. The Justices violated 28USC144 and 28USC455.

Shielding of Criminal Offenders by Supreme Court Police
Criminal Complaints and other unambiguous evidence regarding felonies associated with the 3 initial Supreme Court cases were filed with the Supreme Court Police. A number of these felonies were committed in the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court Police failed to act against the offenders, instead providing a protective umbrella for ongoing lawlessness, e.g. theft of court record, intimidation, and retaliation against a witness.

Tampering with / Illegal removal of Court Evidence
In all 3 related Supreme Court cases at that time, all incriminating evidence implicating President Bush and other senior government officials in crime were illegally removed from Supreme Court Records. Subsequent attempts to re-file the stolen documents repeatedly met with the same offense. In the civil case against President Bush, 41 out of 47 documents filed in the case were stolen from the court records. In the case against 230 Government Officers, 4 incriminating documents were corruptly and repetitively removed. In the case against Senator McCain, Vice President Cheney, Chief Justice Roberts, and other senior officials, 6 pertinent documents were corruptly removed. These documents were re-filed, and repeatedly removed. On 20 occasions to date, the criminal dossiers and the evidence they contain were illegally removed from the Supreme Court Records. Subsequent to the initial 3 cases, the Supreme Court has simply failed to docket or provide a case number for 8 further Supreme Court cases which sought to address the extensive criminal conspiracy. These criminal acts transpired with the full collaboration of the Supreme Court Justices, with the co-operation of the Clerk and his personnel, and under the protective umbrella of the Supreme Court Police. Evidence presented in the 'Dossier of Crimes' and correspondence with the court attests to this fact. These acts of theft of record violated 18USC1506 on numerous counts.

Retaliation against a Witness
Because of my unrelenting persistence to find justice, the government conspirators resorted to witness-tampering (18USC1512) and retaliation against me (18USC1513). This was done with the clear intent to prevent my attendance in official court proceedings and to prevent further testimony against the law-breaking government officers, including the ring-leaders: President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts, Attorney General Gonzales, and FBI Director Mueller. In a further display of abuse of power and of state machinery, President Bush ordered the illegal interception of all my communications in violation of the tenets of the Patriot Act. The Supreme Court willfully neglected to address the crimes and failed to protect a Supreme Court litigant from retaliation by government officials.

Attempted Kidnap and Murder of a Witness

Ordered by President Bush
On February 9th , 2006 a 'Petition for Rehearing' was filed with the US Supreme Court in the case against President Bush (case no. 05-140), together with a Criminal Complaint which addressed the extensive theft of court records. These documents significantly increased the risk of public exposure and prosecution of President Bush and his co-conspirators.

Within 24 hours of these documents being filed in the US Supreme Court, President Bush and his agents initiated a criminal plot to retaliate against me with intent to kill me as primary witness to their crimes - in order to thwart the course of justice and administration of the laws. The execution of this plot commenced in the Supreme Court and unfolded through the offices of the White House, the Boeing Company, and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Under orders from President Bush, White House aids contacted the Boeing Company, my employer at that time. In a mutually beneficial arrangement, officers of the Boeing Company immediately embarked upon an attempt to inveigle me to an area away from my normal workplace, there to unlawfully seize me - kidnap me - in collaboration with and in execution of the plot to murder me. Boeing was offered an attractive contract / compensation to facilitate this iniquitous conduct and the Boeing Board acquiesced to the request. This act violated the statute 18USC1201.

The first attempt to kidnap and murder me (initiated by officers of the Boeing Company) failed and resulted in further criminal charges being filed. A second attempt was undertaken through the Federal Aviation Administration in an effort to prevent information relating to these federal offenses from reaching law enforcement and the courts. The second kidnap attempt was also abortive, but these attempts succeeded in destroying my livelihood and 17-year career as Senior Instructor Pilot with the Boeing Company. Subsequent evidence indicates that the conspirators intend to consummate their sinister plot.

Details of the kidnap and murder plot are further described in the 'Dossier of Crimes' Volume III (State-supported Tyranny upon the Populace), in Chapter 1 and Chapters 41 - 44. The Boeing Company and FAA officers involved, and their co-conspirators, are listed in Chapter 3 of the dossier. A considerable amount of detail of events and evidence of the kidnap attempts is available to investigators. Audio tapes of conversations with Boeing managers and FAA officials clearly indicate the conclusions on intent and reveal the involvement of (former) Attorney General Gonzales and agents from his Justice Department.

The first two foiled kidnap and murder attempts were respectively commanded, facilitated, directed and executed, by President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts, Attorney General Gonzales, and FBI Director Mueller. There is indeed a grim threat and a high likelihood of further retaliation against me on behalf of the seditious conspirators, including the likelihood of a break-in and theft of incriminating documents, or removal of incriminating evidence from my office with a phony search warrant corruptly obtained.

Third Party Participation
Besides the Boeing Company and President Bush and his government agents, a third party was directly involved in the kidnap and murder attempts, namely Air India. During the latter half of 2005 and the first half of 2006 officials from Air India pressured and incited Boeing to act to silence and prevent my witness against Air India - simultaneous to the pressure and incitement by President Bush upon the Boeing Company to facilitate retaliatory action against me. Air India sought to suppress a damning Flight Safety Report authored by me in my capacity as Senior Boeing Instructor Pilot, and sought to suppress their violations of the Indian Aviation Act. In an illegal conspiracy to violate the law, the Boeing Company acquiesced to the incitement by Air India in order to facilitate and protect its 11 billion US Dollar aircraft deal with Air India. Thus the incitement by Air India upon the Boeing Company merged with the incitement by President Bush upon Boeing. Boeing's responses to that dual incitement are not distinguishable. The suppressed flight safety warnings were later to play a crucial role in the death of 158 passengers and crew of Air India Flight IX-812.

A key figure in the criminal plot, the President of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, has since joined the board of The Ford Motor Company and has implicated that company's board members in the criminality.

De Facto Impunity against Arrest
The kidnap and murder attempts have not been investigated or prosecuted - neither by the Department of Justice or the FBI, nor by any other law enforcement agency or state or federal court - despite having been provided with the information and numerous appeals. Exhaustive measures have thus failed to bring President Bush and his co-conspirators and agents to justice before the courts of the United States and failed to secure protection against further attempts upon my life. These malevolent officials in their high office have been granted de facto 'impunity' against arrest for attempted murder and numerous other serious felonies. The common man and the public at large effectively have no practical antidote or protection against such assault upon the public peace and safety by officials in high positions.

Seditious Conspiracy
United States law dictates that if two or more persons conspire to oppose by force the authority of the United States, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, they are in violation of the statute on Seditious Conspiracy (18USC2384).

None of the participants acted alone in the criminal activities described herewith. The complicity (18USC2), and/or accessory role (18USC3), of each of the known criminal conspirators in the attempted kidnap and murder of a key witness to their crimes, is evident from their failure of legal obligation to address that crime - either as responsible United States citizens (18USC4), or as officials pursuant their oath of office and their specific duties associated with their position of authority under the United States.

The criminal acts described above furthered the common aims of, and were of mutual benefit to, all known conspirators. The illegal removal of the criminal dossiers and other incriminating evidence from the Supreme Court Record suppressed information concerning the crimes of all the conspirators. The illegal removal of the mandamus petition in the Bush Supreme Court case saved all the conspirators from a court order enforcing criminal investigation and resultant prosecution. The plot to kidnap and murder me, if it had succeeded, would have wiped all court proceedings against the conspirators clean off the slates. It is the combined action by conspirators that has served to defeat the course of justice so absolutely - one conspirator or group performing one part of the criminal act, another performing the other part of the act. For instance: one group of conspirators committing the crime of retaliation against a witness with intent to murder, the others illegally protecting those law-breaking colleagues by failing to prosecute the crime. (See 18USC371).

This cooperative endeavor amongst the conspirators to commit offenses against the United States, or to assist in the commission thereof, was amply demonstrated during the period March 13 to 25, 2006. I was informed that meetings were held between representatives of the different groupings of conspirators, under the auspices of US Attorney General Gonzales, to plot their evasion of criminal culpability for crimes committed, to render criminal assistance to one another, and to plot further retaliatory action against me.

To date, approximately 15,000 US government and industry officials have conspired to, by force, prevent, hinder, and delay the execution of the laws of the United States, in violation of the law prohibiting seditious conspiracy, 18USC2384. Every conspirator violated at least 16 criminal statutes as principal offender. Every conspirator is also culpable under law, of the offenses of every other conspirator. The number of crimes committed in this seditious conspiracy is thus 15,000 x 16 x 15,000 = 3.6 billion crimes. These are sobering statistics, and represent a powerful insurrection against the laws of the United States.

The Role of President Obama

Bush Plot Inherited
Ninety four (94) appeals to Barack Obama as US Senator and/or President to date, have informed him of the seditious conspiracy and requested that he take care of the faithful execution of the laws. Evidence of the anarchy was presented to him on most of those occasions. Despite his first-hand knowledge of the ongoing murder plot (as reiterated in a White House meeting which he attended on January 7, 2009, which he attended); despite his obligations under the Constitution and his oath of office; notwithstanding his moral duties to society, thus far President Obama has taken no action to tend to the criminality and has resolutely suppressed the affair.

President Obama is directly responsible for the corrupt and summary dismissal of several recent criminal cases in the United States courts, which cases fruitlessly attempted to address the crimes committed by US Officials and their co-conspirators.  President Obama was also implored to dismantle the trap set for my kidnapping (by President Bush) at the Boeing Company and at the FAA, and to repeal the murder plot.  This he has tacitly refused to do, leaving the assassination plot inherited from President Bush menacingly intact and corroborating his involvement.

Within the heart of the US Department of Justice, President Obama maintains an operational taskforce to manage various aspects of the criminal endeavor as well as the fallout from my efforts to instigate law, order, and justice. This taskforce is also tasked to 'contend with me' as principal witness to the crimes committed by US government officers (including those committed by President Obama himself). This operational team, together with its predecessor under President Bush, has been responsible for the tapping of my communications, slander of my good name, for destroying my career and livelihood, for preventing me from practicing my profession, for denying me justice in the courts, and for executing the attempts to kidnap and assassinate me. On that team are to be found the controllers of the assassins who currently plot my demise.

In direct response to my filing of a US Supreme Court case in re 'International Terrorism and Murder' on December 2010, this team activated a third ploy to kill me – this time intending to operate through one of the Departments of the Washington State Government. It appears that the attempt has temporarily been suspended since the plan has come to light.

As with President Bush, President Obama is a defendant in the criminal case 'United States of America vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators' brought by the United States against the insurgents. The case remains pending in the United States Supreme Court - although effectively and illegally obstructed. As a consequence, and pursuant the Constitution (14th Amendment, §3) and the laws (18USC2381 & 18USC2383), President Obama may not hold office under the United States.

The Role of the President's Cabinet
The entire United States 'Executive', including every member of the Cabinets of Presidents Bush and Obama, has been informed of the seditious conspiracy against the United States of America. Every executive member, recent and present, has been provided with prima facie evidence thereof and has been requested to take action against the subversion and crime. Every executive member has a duty to act and has taken an oath to perform that duty and to defend the nation against its enemies, foreign or domestic. And every executive member has instead chosen to provide aid and comfort to known insurgents.

There are many other high profile and politically powerful officials amongst the conspirators. Their propensity to malice and the absolute impunity with which they can and do violate the laws is amply demonstrated in the 'Dossier of Crimes'. When the extent of their legal predicament is considered and evidence of stalking is taken into account, further attempts to eliminate me as witness are highly probable.

Insurrection against the Laws of the United States

Rebellion
United States law dictates that, whoever incites, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States, or the laws thereof, or gives aid and comfort thereto, is in violation of the statute on Rebellion or Insurrection (18USC2383) and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. At the time of writing, some 15,000 US federal and state officials have breached this statute, yet they illegally remain in their positions of power from whence they continue to conspire against the United States and its laws.

The revolt against the authority and the laws of the United States is powerfully demonstrated by the corrupt proceedings of the 51 court cases listed in Appendix 2 below. The patently corrupt proceedings violate multiple laws on innumerable counts in order to protect lawbreaking government officials and clearly constitute a powerful insurrection against the laws of the United States.

The Role of the Justice Department and FBI
Since January 27, 2003, the United States Department of Justice, its Attorney Generals and US Attorneys, US Marshals, and FBI, have step by step been kept informed of the development of this pervasive insurrection against the laws via more than 1000 letters and 90 filings of the 'Dossier of Crimes'. The noteworthy response of the Department of Justice was to dispatch its FBI agents in February 2006, to co-ordinate my kidnap and murder through surrogates at the Boeing Company and the FAA. When those attempts failed, the Department of Justice held meetings with all interested parties to plot their next malicious steps to thwart the administration of the laws.

The Role of the Federal Courts
From the earliest stages of the matter, the role of the federal judiciary has been one of considerable corruption. Amongst numerous other statutory obligations to act against malfeasant officials, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 4 and 41) dictate that the courts 'shall' arrest those defendants in a court action who are suspected of crime. Not a single arrest has been made. Not a single crime, amongst a multitude committed by officials, has been investigated or prosecuted despite overwhelming evidence presented.

In every civil and criminal case filed against the seditious government conspirators, the federal courts simply swept all criminal charges against officials under the carpet, thereby impeding a critical function of government and nullifying their very own raison d'κtre. (See Appendix 2 for a list of court cases). In that way, 1252 fully informed federal judges aided and abetted known criminals to escape justice, with one paramount purpose in mind: to protect seditious officials from prosecution and public disgrace, knowing that those officials would do the same for them.

Three (3) criminal cases against officials, filed by the United States in the US District Court of Colorado, were summarily and illegally dismissed by corrupt judges sans addressing the underlying crimes. The 3 criminal cases were consolidated into a single subversion case 'United States of America vs. 14, 164 Seditious Conspirators', filed in the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices, who are themselves defendants in that case, predictably obstructed the case in their court, thereby setting the abysmal paradigm for the entire federal court system on the matter.

The Role of State Governments and Judiciary of the 50 States
The governments of the 50 States of the United States have been fully informed of the insurrection and sedition through their governors, attorneys general, police chiefs, legislators, and the judges of three levels of state courts. The state governments and judiciary were provided with evidence of the crimes and were similarly requested to use their authority under law to take appropriate action against the subversion. No action has been forthcoming from any of the state governments or courts to address the torrent of crime. The states have instead provided safe haven and passage to the insurgents - many of them resident in their own states.

The Role of the United States Armed Forces
Given the extent of the insurrection within the government and considering the powerful obstruction to the administration and execution of the laws exercised by the insurgents, the 5 Joint Chiefs of Staff and 53 other admirals and generals of the United States Armed Forces were informed of the sedition and were requested to address the insurrection against the laws.

The United States Armed Forces have a duty prescribed by law and its senior officers have taken an oath to defend the country against its enemies, foreign or domestic. Yet, amongst the nation's top military commanders, amongst 58 generals and admirals who are fully informed of the insurrection, no one has dared to break ranks and address the sedition; no one has shown the fortitude or rectitude to perform their clearly defined military duty; and not one has honored his oath to defend the nation against its domestic enemies in this case. Not one. Every one of the 58 generals and admirals has actively assisted and engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States, and the laws thereof, and has given aid and comfort thereto.

The Role of the U.S. Congress
Amongst my thousands of written appeals for protection of the laws are numerous appeals to every one of the 535 Members of Congress, individually, to address the criminal conspiracy within the government. In addition, the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, the Senate Committee on Government Affairs, the House Committee on Government Reform, the Senate President and the Speaker of the House, all have been requested through multiple letters to take action pursuant congressional oversight jurisdiction over the executive and judiciary. To no avail.

Instead of addressing the crimes detailed in the 'Dossier of Crimes' and tackling the corruption in the courts, the committees and Congressmen shunned the requests and willfully failed to perform their critical oversight duties. With callous indifference they sanctioned the criminal activities of their peers. Amongst the Congressmen who have failed to act was Senator Barack Obama, who took office as President on January 20, 2009, thus guaranteeing continuity of the immorality and criminality within the United States Government.

The Role of a 'Free' United States Press
Periodic press releases to the main American news media (97 releases to date), informed correspondents during a decade of proliferation of the seditious conspiracy and insurrection against the laws. The point of view is held that the American press has a moral duty, if not a legal duty, to inform the American nation of the corruption within the government establishment. Throughout the propagation of the criminal endeavor described herewith, the American press - monopolized, manipulated, and controlled, though fully informed – has remained silent, while the American nation has slumbered on.

Incestuous Relationship between Branches of the US Government
Thus the courts illegally protected Presidents Bush and Obama and their co-conspirators from culpability for crimes committed, including the crime of conspiracy to kidnap and murder. Congress consecutively protected the Presidents and corrupt judges from impeachment and prosecution. In their turn, the Congressmen enjoy the protection of the President and the courts from culpability for their failure of crucial duty to the people and to the state. One dirty hand washing the other. Providing a protective umbrella over this lawlessness are the generals and admirals of the Armed Forces of the United States.

The evidence to hand vividly exposes the incestuous relationship between the three branches of United States Government. This undesirable closed loop association, which saturates all levels of the establishment, has fostered mutual assistance and incitement to engage in rebellion and insurrection against the laws of the United States and has provided aid and comfort to insurgents.

Treason against the United States
Each one of the approximately 15,000 US government officials involved in this insurrection against the laws of the United States owes allegiance to the United States and has taken an oath before God and the nation to avow that allegiance. Each of the government officials involved has an individual and undivided collective duty to defend the United States against its enemies, foreign or domestic. Each government official involved has willfully failed to defend the United States and its people against insurgents from within who are bent on rebellion against the laws of the country. Each has instead given aid and comfort to the insurrection against the laws and provided protection to known criminals. And each US government officer so engaged has committed an unmitigated act of treason against the United States.

For, the law unambiguously states that whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or, adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States (18USC2381).

This lawless milieu existing within the United States government, the courts, and industry, has culpability in the deaths of 158 innocent people in India.

Mass Murder of 158 People

When one intends to kill subject ‘A’ but kills subject ‘B’ in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject ‘B’.

Boeing Company and Air India Officials are inextricably implicated in the kidnap and murder attempts wrought upon me in my (former) capacity as Senior Instructor Pilot for the Boeing Company and in my capacity as a Supreme Court litigant. As stated, the dual aim of their joint attempts to kill me was to eliminate all evidence of their criminal wrongdoing from the courts, and to illegally suppress damaging flight safety warnings and violations of the Indian Aviation Act.

Acquiescing to pressure by Air India, Boeing wrongfully prevented the onward distribution of the flight safety warnings and imperative corrective measures. Boeing also wrongfully imposed disciplinary action upon me, threatened to terminate my employment, and plotted to assassinate me. Combining with President Bush and his government agents, the troika of Bush, Boeing, and Air India, was responsible for wrongfully terminating my employment, revoking my flying license, preventing me from practicing my profession, destroying my career and my livelihood, tampering with court evidence, and engaging in the (foiled) attempts to kidnap and murder me

The willful and illegal suppression of pertinent flight safety warnings and remedial actions through the events described above, caused or significantly contributed to the deaths of 158 passengers and crew who perished in the crash of Air India Flight IX-812 at Mangalore, India, on May 22, 2010. The suppressed safety warnings cautioned Air India, amongst other, on the acute dangers of pilot fatigue due to violations of flight and duty time limitations. The safety warnings predicted an accident with potential loss of life should those warnings not be heeded.

The 'Court of Inquiry' into the Mangalore accident found that the Captain of the flight was fatigued and had slept for more than half the duration of the flight. The 'Inquiry' concluded that the Captain: likely suffered from 'sleep inertia' when he awoke (akin to mental disorientation); deviated in speed and in altitude from his descent, approach, and landing flight path profile; overran the runway as a result; and crashed down a hillside at the far end of the field. Pilot error was the cause of the runway overrun and fatigue was the cause of the pilot error. Suppression of the flight safety warnings and remedial actions was the direct cause of the fatigue; and attempted kidnap and murder of the author was in turn the cause of the suppression of the safety warnings.

Although the deaths of the 158 persons on board Flight IX-812 were not caused with malice aforethought, their murder was perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect my death as author of the flight safety warnings – in that manner to suppress those safety warnings and remedial actions. Corrective actions to the safety warnings would most certainly have prevented the accident. The suppression of the safety warnings by attempts to kidnap and murder me as author of those warnings is directly linked to the deaths of the passengers and crew.

Pursuant the Indian Penal Code, Section 301, and the United States Code, statute 18USC1111, the Air India and Boeing Company officials are culpable in the murder of the passengers and crew of Flight IX-812 - having caused the deaths of persons other than the one they intended to kill by their actions. These criminal acts are more fully described in the Dossier of Crimes, Volume III, Chapter 42.2.3, and constitute murder in the first degree.

Air India and Boeing Company officials did not act alone in their attempts to kidnap and murder me and thereby suppress safety warnings and court evidence. They acted in conspiracy with US Government officials led by President Bush. Culpability in the abortive kidnap and murder attempts and ongoing assassination plot is shared by all co-conspirators who assisted the troika of Air India, Boeing, and President Bush (via agents) to suppress important flight safety warnings and court evidence, and to escape justice. Likewise, culpability in the murder of the 158 people who died on Flight IX812 is shared by all co-conspirators in that premeditated design to maliciously effect the death of someone other than those persons who were killed. The names of all co-conspirators are listed in the Dossier of Crimes, Volume 1, Chapter 3

International Terrorism

Terrorism within the United States
The United States Code, Statute 18USC2331 (5), defines "domestic terrorism" as activities that a) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; b) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (c) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

The violent criminal activities within the US Government, the courts, and industry, described above, have engendered a harsh impact upon the American people. Law-breaking government officials have resorted to intimidation, coercion, and conspiracy to kidnap and murder a court litigant, in order to protect themselves and their peers from prosecution. This unlawful enterprise has rendered meaningless the protections, rights, and freedoms, enshrined in the United States Constitution. This corrupt US government policy of protecting law-breaking government officials from prosecution has been enforced by acts dangerous to human life, namely, the three foiled murder attempts and an active and ongoing kidnap and assassination plot against a witness.

These perilous criminal acts committed in pursuit of a corrupt US government policy are a violation of the criminal laws and constitute domestic terrorism in terms of the dictates of US statute 18USC2331(5). (See Dossier of Crimes, Vol. III, Chapter 49). It is these same perilous criminal acts which led to the murder of the 158 people in India on the morning of May 22, 2010.

Proliferation into the International Arena
Although this criminal endeavor originated in the United States as domestic terrorism, it has proliferated and transcended national boundaries in terms of the locale in which the perpetrators have influence, operate, and enjoy asylum. A number of officials from international organizations have become embroiled in the criminal scheme by actively providing safe haven and passage and material support to the group of terrorists from the United States and India. Besides officials from Air India and the Indian Supreme Court who are implicated in the terrorist activities, other international officials so entangled include officers from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), the European Union and European governments, and United Nations (UN) officials.

The Role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
A number of former and currently serving NATO Officials from the United States are directly implicated in the aforementioned violent criminal activities. NATO Officials who are complicit in the kidnap and murder plot are the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, General John Craddock; former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Transformation, General Lance Smith; former NATO Chief of Staff and Military Committee Member: General Peter Pace; former Commander-in-Chief of United States Armed Forces under NATO (and NATO Head of State), President George W. Bush.

Three contemporary NATO leaders from the United States who are principal offenders in the ongoing terrorist activities, who currently operate with impunity within NATO, and who enjoy safe haven and passage from NATO Officials, are: NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Europe: Admiral James Stavridis; NATO Military Committee Member: Admiral Mike Mullen; NATO Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of United States Armed Forces under NATO: President Barack Obama. Details of the criminal offenses of these NATO Officials from the United States and particulars of their involvement were presented to several NATO departments with an express appeal for action to terminate the ongoing lawlessness.

NATO has an obligation to take urgent action to terminate the international terrorist activities of their members and to apprehend the conspirators before they commit further acts of violence. However, in a combined effort to protect serving NATO Officials from criminal prosecution (and presumably in an attempt to protect NATO's good standing in the international community), NATO has willfully refused to act against them and instead has provided safe haven and passage to known terrorists in its ranks. NATO Officials aided and abetted the conspirators (Obama, Mullen, Stavridis, Bush, Craddock, Smith, and Pace), provided them impunity, and consequently rendered themselves complicit in the ongoing terrorist activities. Those officials who secured safe haven and passage to the plotters include NATO Heads of State and Heads of Government, NATO Secretary General Staff, and NATO Military Commanders. (See Dossier of Crimes, Vol. II, Chapter 18.42).

The Role of the European Union and Council of Europe
When the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation failed to acts against the terrorist group in its ranks, law enforcement and protection was sought from officials of the European Union and the Council of Europe to deal with the terrorist group and those who harbor them. To no avail. The European Union and Council of Europe and the Heads of State and Government of the respective member countries are fully aware of the murderers and prospective kidnappers in their midst and/or those who have harbored them. Yet, the European Union and Council of Europe also failed to apprehend the criminals and have instead provided them with safe haven and passage. Such criminal acts transgress the laws of the European and international community.

The Role of United Nations Officials
Through a series of letters and supporting documentation, (including the 'Dossier of Crimes'), the UN Secretary General, Security Council, and General Assembly, have been kept informed of the proliferation of the international criminal conspiracy and of the role of the US Ambassadors and other top US and NATO Officials therein.

UN Officials, including the Security Council, were advised of the complete failure by the authorities of both the United States and NATO countries to deal with the crimes committed by their respective and mutual officials. UN Officials were also informed that none of the serious crimes had been investigated or prosecuted. Instead, the crimes were concealed in a concerted effort by US and NATO Officials to cover up those crimes and to protect the offenders from prosecution. Moreover, UN Officials were informed of the murder of 158 innocent people and the ongoing plot to kill a key witness to the crimes.

Under the criminal laws of their host country (pursuant statutes 18USC4 and 18USC2382), UN Officials have an obligation to report all known crimes to a judge or to a person in authority who is not involved in the broad criminal scheme. Having knowledge that many senior US Officials were deeply implicated in the affair, UN Officials were nevertheless reminded of their legal obligations and were simultaneously requested to refer the matter to the International Criminal Court and to Interpol for investigation and prosecution.

Certain UN Officials who were approached willfully omitted to execute peremptory statutory duties regarding the international terrorist activities and kidnap and murder plot. By their deliberate failure to act where action was due, UN Officials furthered the aims of and joined with that criminal conspiracy. Further details of their malfeasance and criminal charges filed against several UN Officials are presented in the Dossier of Crimes, Vol. II, Chapter 18.43.

In addition to the UN Secretary General and Security Council, Ambassadors and Heads of State and Government from 192 UN Member Countries have now been informed of the international criminal activities, have been presented with prima facie evidence thereof, and have been requested to act against the terrorism. UN Ambassadors are obligated to deal with the group of terrorists within the United Nations Organization pursuant statutes 18USC4 and 18USC2382 like any other denizen of the United States. UN Heads of State and Government have a moral obligation to ensure that their ambassadors perform those legal duties to their UN host country, the United States. Decisive and urgent action by UN Officials is vital and is awaited in order to terminate the international terrorist activities and to safeguard life and limb and prevent further acts of violence from being perpetrated by the international criminal endeavor.

The Evidence

Prima Facie Proof
Despite the complete and willful absence of official investigations, three primary sources of information provide unassailable evidence of the crimes committed by the more than 15,000-strong international terrorist group. The sources of prima facie evidence are: a) Written Appeals for Protection of the Laws b) Court proceedings and court records in 51 US court cases and 2 further cases abroad; and c) The Dossier of Crimes.

Appeals for Protection of the Laws
Correspondence with US and international officials, informing them of the violent criminal conspiracy and appealing for the enforcement, administration, and execution of the laws upon the terrorists, and their refusal to act, provide further clear evidence of the role of international government and industry officials in the broad criminal conspiracy.

Corrupt Court Proceedings
Fifty one (51) US court cases sought in vain to address different aspects and groupings of the criminal conspiracy. (Appendix 2). In every one of the 51 interrelated US court cases the courts not only failed to deal with the deluge of crimes presented to the courts but actively suppressed the shameful issue. Corrupt US state and federal judges lent their full support to the government conspirators, joined forces with their aims to obstruct the course of justice, and denied due process and protection of the laws in every conceivable way in all 51 US court cases.

Court documents filed in more than 220 corrupt proceedings of the US cases provide unmistakable evidence of the subversive activities of law-breaking judicial officers. In many instances documents have been illegally removed from court records by the conspirators. However, copies of those documents and proof of filing are available to investigators directly from the writer.

The India Supreme Court has likewise corruptly endeavored to keep the criminal case against Air India officials out of the court and has failed to deal with the crimes committed by Air India Directors associated with this case and filed with the India Supreme Court. See Diary Nos. 5352/2006/SC/PIL and 13690/SC/PIL/2010. (Copies of documents and criminal charges lodged in the case are available to investigators directly from the writer).

A case filed in the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague remains pending, subject to UN Security Council authorization and referral. See ICC Reference No. OTP-CR-372/07.

The Dossier of Crimes
The nefarious actions of the conspirators must be measured against the laws that forbid such actions. That assessment is made throughout the 'Dossier of Crimes'. For the most part the laws are very clear.

Crimes committed by each of the conspirators and by groups of conspirators are meticulously documented and prima facie evidence is provided in some 2000 pages of the 'Dossier of Crimes'. The dossier was first compiled on January 17, 2003, and has been continuously updated over the years since then as the criminal activity escalated. The latest revision of the dossier available to investigators and prosecutors is dated June 15, 2011

Summary

Originating in the United States courts in January 2002, an ever increasing deluge of crime committed by government officials of the United States has yet to be terminated. The malfeasance includes: refusal by the FBI to investigate lawbreaking government officials; refusal by prosecutors to prosecute; refusal by judges to administer the laws upon malfeasant officials; refusal by consecutive US Presidents (Bush and Obama) to take care of the faithful execution of the laws upon felonious officials; conspiracy by government officials against the public's right to due process and protection of the laws as should be secured by the normal functions of government.

A virulent seditious conspiracy and a powerful insurrection against the laws of the United States ensued in the upper echelons of US government and the courts to conceal those crimes and shield the perpetrators from prosecution. When the criminal endeavor was imminently to be exposed in the US Supreme Court, conspirators resorted to kidnap and murder in order to prevent testimony in the courts. Three successive murder attempts were foiled, but evidence shows that the murder plot remains active and primed under incumbent President Obama.

Thus, there remains in American society today a large parcel of crimes perpetrated by high officials of the United States government, acting in concert with industry officials from Boeing and Air India companies, which has yet to be investigated and prosecuted. The seditious conspirators illegally remain in their positions from whence they abuse government power in pursuit of their criminal endeavors. Moreover, they perpetrate their criminal deeds with the full support and participation of key US government institutions: the White House and the Cabinet; the Department of Justice and the FBI; the US Congress; the Courts; the 50 State Governments; and the Armed Forces of the United States. To date, some 15,000 US government and industry officials have combined and cooperated to defeat the course of justice and to provide 'impunity' to common criminals in their midst.

Enforced by the violence of three foiled kidnap and murder attempts and an ongoing assassination plot against a court witness, this corrupt government policy of protecting law-breaking officials from prosecution constitutes domestic terrorism in terms of United States law. Within this lawless milieu, the mass murder of 158 innocent people in India is attributable to certain conspirators in the criminal endeavor - and therefore attributable to all conspirators.

The terrorist activities within the United States have proliferated beyond American borders and have infiltrated the international arena in terms of the countries and organizations in which the perpetrators operate and enjoy asylum. Although fully informed of the terrorism in the United States and despite having an individual and collective duty to address the lawless activities of some of their members, certain leaders and officials from the European Union, the Council of Europe, NATO, and the United Nations, have sanctioned the violence perpetrated by US officials. Leaders and officials from these international organizations have abrogated their duties to the international community and have instead condoned and actively provided safe haven and passage to the perpetrators from the United States. International leaders have thereby implicated themselves in the international criminal endeavor by harboring and supporting known conspirators – conspirators to sedition, insurrection, treason, mass murder, and international terrorism, amongst a multitude of other crimes.

Conclusion

Laws based on reason and good judgment - and the protection provided by enforcing those laws on the population and on government officials alike - is what keeps a nation free from tyranny. Without the faithful application of the laws upon official misconduct, the populations of western democracies are no more 'free from tyranny' than those in more overt dictatorships.

The scourge of impunity afforded to government and industry leaders across the globe has caused much suffering in our day. Despite benign constitutions of nations and platitudes of protection of the laws; despite international organizations like the United Nations, NATO, and the European Union, dedicated to peace and law and order; and notwithstanding profuse rhetoric on freedom from oppression and the virtues of the rule of law, impunity provided to our leaders engaged in all manner of crimes against humanity, remains a potent force for evil upon our planet. The case presented herewith demonstrates the widespread and harsh effects of such impunity.

Whilst one recognizes the misguided tendency of humanity to band together in groups to protect the mostly selfish interests of the group or of individuals in the group, much of the time such protection is provided at the expense of the interests of another group or individuals in that other group. However, the nobler principles of love for humanity and service to fellowman stretches beyond the protection of an errant or law-breaking colleague, beyond any group interest, beyond party-political inclinations to the rest of the citizens of nations; even beyond the generally selfish interests of nations, further onwards to the rest of humanity.

For the sake of peace and security of the international community, the international terrorist activities described herewith must be investigated and the perpetrators must be brought to justice without further delay.  The ongoing deluge of crime being perpetrated by the international conspirators must be addressed unreservedly and terminated in no uncertain manner.  This calls for courageous men and woman within the judicial systems and governments of the countries caught-up, to eradicate the ongoing evil - men and woman with a developed sense of justice and sincere goodwill towards their fellowman.  It calls for action by morally strong leaders of the international community to terminate the violent activities affecting the global society - not just for our own security per se, but also for the sake of future generations. 

When such leaders arise I shall say my task is done.

Anthony P. Keyter



Appendix 1


List of Institutions that Failed to Take Action

Some 15,000 US government officers from 620 United States federal and state government institutions have been approached but have failed to address the domestic terrorist activities, sedition, insurrection and treason,within the government and the courts of the United States. These institutions are listed below:

Number of Institutions
US Presidency1
US Cabinet1
US Department of Justice: Civil Rights Division, Criminal Division, AG Office3
US Attorneys90
US State Department1
US Police: US Marshals, Secret Service, Supreme Court Police, FBI4
US Senate, Committees on Judiciary, Homeland Security & Govt. Affairs3
US House, Committees on Judiciary, Government Oversight 3
US Armed Forces1
US District Courts51
US Appeals Courts: DC Circuit, Fed. Circuit, 9th Circuit, 10th Circuit4
US Supreme Court1
State Governors50
State Cabinet/Executive50
State Attorneys General50
State Senate50
State House of Representatives50
State Police/Patrol50
State Superior Courts54
State Appeals Courts35
State Supreme Courts50
State Committees: Ethics, Judicial Conduct, Gender and Justice3
State Bar Associations2
County Sheriffs2
County Prosecutors2
County Councils2
County Ethics Committee1
City Police2
City Prosecutors2
City Councils2
Total Number of Institutions620



Appendix 2

Proceedings in the following 51 United States court cases and 2 international cases substantiate the verity of the facts presented in the 'Synopsis of the Case'. Except for the first mentioned case in the International Criminal Court which remains pending, these cases have in vain attempted to address the proliferation of the international terrorism plot, only to be thwarted before trial by corrupt judges and intervening government officials.

List Of International Court Cases

Criminal Complaint against Bush, Roberts Gonzales, Mueller
  1. International Criminal Court, The Hague: Reference # OTP-CR-372/07 – pending authorization and referral by the UN Security Council.
Criminal Plaint against Directors of Air India
  1. Supreme Court of India, Diary Nos. 5352/2006/SC/PIL and 13690/SC/PIL/2010.
List of United States Court Cases

In Re: International Terrorism Plot
  1. U.S. District Court, Delaware, Case # 10-802
  2. U.S. 3rd Circuit, Case # 10-4296
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
In Re Anthony Keyter, Complaining Witness in Domestic Terrorism Plot
  1. U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Case # 10mc5.
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Case # 10-1267.
In Re: Domestic Terrorism Plot
  1. U.S. District Court, Delaware, Case # 10-36
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, Case # 10-2209.
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
In Re: Terrorism Plot
  1. U.S. District Court, Rhode Island, Case # 10-MC-36-S-DLM
  2. U.S. District Court, Rhode Island, Case # 10-MC-130-LDA
United States vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00085-ZLW
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1064
United States vs. 443 Known Insurgents
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00086-ZLW
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1063
United States vs. 535 Members of the 110th Congress
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Case # 08-cr-00087-ZLW
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, Case # 08-1061
United States vs. 14,164 Seditious Conspirators
  1. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
[United States of America] vs. 111th Congress
  1. U.S. District Court, Maine, Case # 09-516
  2. U.S. First Circuit Appeals Court, Case # 09-2617
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
[United States of America] vs. Justices of US Supreme Court
  1. U.S. District Court, Maine, Case # 09-517
  2. U.S. First Circuit Appeals Court, Case # 09-2618
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
[United States of America] vs. Pres. Obama and Cabinet
  1. U.S. District Court, Maine, Case # 09-518
  2. U.S. First Circuit Appeals Court, Case # 09-2619
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, case number not assigned.
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Obama/Cabinet/Congress/ Supreme Court Justices
  1. U.S. District Court, Massachusetts, Case # 09-11700
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Bush, Roberts, Gonzales, Mueller
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Case # 1: 08cv97
Anthony P. Keyter vs. The Boeing Company
  1. U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Case # 09-962
Anthony P. Keyter vs. The Ford Motor Company
  1. U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Case # 09-897
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Air India
  1. U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Case # 09-825
Combined Appeal: Anthony P. Keyter vs. Boeing, Ford, and Air India
  1. U.S. Supreme Court, case # not assigned.
Anthony P. Keyter vs. United States of America<
  1. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case # 3: 08cv260
Anthony P. Keyter vs. George W. Bush
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, Case # 03-cv-2496 (EGS)
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04- 5324
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, Case # 05-140
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Senator John McCain, et al
  1. U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Case # CV05-01923- PHX-DGC
  2. U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Case # 06-15253
  3. U.S. Supreme Court, Case # 06-1069
Anthony P. Keyter vs. 230 Government Officers
  1. U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, Case # 3: 04cv5867
  2. U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Case # 05- 35717
  3. US Supreme Court, Case # 06-284.
Anthony P. Keyter vs. John Ashcroft, et al.
  1. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04-5392
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Vice President Dick Cheney, et al.
  1. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case # 04-5365
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Haggerty et al.
  1. US District Court, Oregon, Case # 08-cv-00545
Anthony P. Keyter vs. Maureen E. Keyter
  1. Washington State Superior Court, Case # 00-3-02932-1
  2. Washington State Superior Court, Case # 04-2-13977-1
  3. Washington State Court of Appeals, Case # 2737-6-II
  4. Washington State Supreme Court, Case # 76972-9
  5. Washington State Supreme Court, Case # 76956-7
  6. US Supreme Court, Case # not assigned.