The original offenses which first gave rise to the acts of domestic terrorism were perpetrated during legal proceedings in the Washington State Superior Court, Pierce County. (See the case Keyter vs. Keyter). The presiding judge colluded with one of the lawyers and litigants, to perpetrate a host of premeditated criminal offenses, including, but not limited to:

The breaches of law committed in the Court of Washington State were first reported to law enforcement officers and when no action was taken, were reported to a wider circle of relevant State officials tasked with law and order. The Washington State authorities simply ignored the reported crimes and withheld imperative legal duties to investigate and prosecute - almost certainly because of the involvement of the errant judge. These State authorities thus became embroiled in the crimes themselves. They include the Washington State governor, lt. governor, attorney general, secretary of state, legislators, state police, prosecutors, and judges. Their willful failure of duty violated the Revised Code of Washington RCW on numerous counts, including:

The denial by state officials (of fundamental rights to due process of law, protection of the laws, and ownership of de jure property) not only violated the Washington State Constitution, but also the United States Constitution and several federal laws besides. The federal offenses were then reported to agents at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and prosecutors at the US Department of Justice, for investigation and prosecution of the offenders where the federal laws were found to be violated. Once again, most certainly because of the involvement of officials in the crimes, these two federal institutions simply ignored the blatant offenses and official misconduct. A wider search for justice was subsequently pursued within the US Federal Government, which included the United States Congress and judiciary committees, the President and the Cabinet. All to no avail. Each US Government Official approached simply ignored the multiple criminal complaints and contraventions of the Constitution, and chose instead to protect delinquent state and federal officials from the consequences of any wrongdoing. By that dereliction of non-discretionary duty each new official approached, violated several federal laws themselves, including:

The offenses committed by state and federal officials were in turn reported to the federal courts who have a duty to deal with such reports (See 18USC3041, 3046, & 3060). Yet again, in order to protect the malfeasant officials from prosecution, the official misconduct and dereliction of judicial duty advanced uninterruptedly through United States District Courts, Appeals Courts, and disgracefully, through the US Supreme Court. Although the cover-up of official wrongdoing was absolute, the number and severity of offenses committed in concealing the criminal endeavor kept escalating, and included:

When the aforementioned crimes were imminently to be exposed in the US Supreme Court in case no. 05-140, a case against President Bush, the President swiftly instructed his agents who then (on behalf of all the offending government officers) attempted to kidnap and murder the prime witness to this deluge of felonies committed by government officials. The Boeing Company, who was the employer of the primary witness at that time, facilitated the first (foiled) kidnap and murder attempt in return for government favors – which were most probably connected with the Air Force Tanker Aircraft Program. A second abortive kidnap and murder attempt followed shortly thereafter via the Federal Aviation Administration.

Early in February 2011, the imminent exposure of this anarchy within the United States Government and judiciary provoked a third attempt to murder the key witness (the author of this website) – led by President Obama with the knowledge and sanction of his Cabinet, Justices of the US Supreme Court, and the Senators and Representatives of the United States Congress. (See ‘Selected Correspondence below). The plot remains essentially the same as the first two attempts made via the Boeing Company and the FAA, except that the third murder attempt unfolded through one of the Departments of the Washington State Government. These acts violated the following laws:

Although the initial kidnap and murder attempts were foiled and reported to an ever widening circle of officials tasked with law and order, those crimes have yet to be investigated and prosecuted. Evidence indicates that the conspiracy to murder remained active under President Bush and is currently primed and active under President Obama - with the knowledge and consent of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Department of Justice, US Attorneys, the FBI, the CIA, generals and admirals of the Armed Forces, and numerous state and federal judicial officers. (See Synopsis of the Case). The joint effort by these officials to neutralize a prime court witness to official wrongdoing, and to prevent, hinder, or delay, by violence, the execution of the laws of the United States upon law-breaking government officers, constitutes a clear violation of the statute on sedition:

Not only are the top echelons of the United States Federal Government informed of the extensive seditious conspiracy within the government and the courts, but the 50 State Governments have also been informed and implored to deal with the seditious conspirators in terms of their legal obligations and to honor their oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. State officials, who have a clear duty to address the criminality in their ranks, include state governors, lieutenant governors, secretaries of state, police chiefs, prosecutors, legislators, and judges of three levels of state courts. No action has been forthcoming from any of the state governments or courts to deal with the deluge of crime. The large number of state and federal officials who have collectively cooperated to provide safe haven and passage to the seditious conspirators (some 15,000-plus), constitute an insurrection against the authority of the United States and against the laws thereof, and have given aid and comfort to the domestic enemies of the state, in violation of the statutes on subversion, namely:

The activities of the state and federal officials implicated in the aforementioned criminal violations, involve acts dangerous to human life – that of kidnap and murder. The plot by government officials to murder a prime court witness to their crimes is active and ongoing. The threat of further and imminent attempts upon life and limb are factual and menacing. The activities are intended to (i) intimidate and coerce. Threats have been issued by several judges, all alluding to retaliatory action, including the implicit threat of (false) incarceration if efforts continue to seek justice in the courts concerning this case. (See court rulings of the various cases listed elsewhere on this web). Other criminal acts committed by federal judges that are meant to intimidate include extortion, contempt of court and of the laws, theft of evidence, tampering with a witness, and more. These offenses are aimed at silencing the prime witness and obstructing efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice. The acts dangerous to human life, the intimidation, extortion, coercion, threats of violence (false incarceration, retaliation, kidnap, and assassination) committed by a conspiracy of 15000-plus government and industry officials, are clearly intended to influence, to establish, and to enforce by violence, a corrupt United States government policy, viz.: where government officers are found to be implicated in crime, there to illegally shield them from investigation and prosecution by obstructing the administration of the laws, by defeating the course of justice, by providing protection to known criminals, and denying constitutional rights to due process and protection of the laws. The kidnap and murder attempts by US government officials in conjunction with Boeing Company officials, intended to intimidate, coerce, establish and enforce a corrupt government policy, unmistakably violate the laws on domestic terrorism:

Boeing Company and Air India Officials are inextricably implicated in the three kidnap and murder attempts wrought upon a Senior Instructor Pilot for the Boeing Company in his capacity as a US Supreme Court litigant. The aim of their joint attempts to kill him was to illegally suppress damaging flight safety warnings and to eliminate all evidence from the courts of criminal wrongdoing by officials of these two companies.  The willful and illegal suppression of pertinent flight safety warnings and remedial actions caused or significantly contributed to the deaths of 158 passengers and crew who perished in the crash of Air India Flight IX-812 at Mangalore, India, on May 22, 2010. The suppressed safety warnings cautioned Air India, amongst other, on the acute dangers of pilot fatigue due to violations of flight and duty time limitations.  The ‘Court of Inquiry’ into the Mangalore accident found that the Captain of the flight was fatigued and had slept for more than half the duration of the flight.  The ‘Inquiry’ concluded that the Captain likely suffered from ‘sleep inertia’ when he awoke, deviated from his descent and approach flight path profile, overran the runway as a result and crashed down a hillside at the far end of the field.  Although the deaths of the 158 persons on board Flight IX-812 were not caused with malice aforethought, their murder was perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of the Boeing Instructor Pilot as author of the flight safety warnings – in that manner to suppress those safety warnings and remedial actions.   Corrective actions to the safety warnings would most certainly have prevented the accident.

When one intends to kill subject ‘A’ but kills subject ‘B’ in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject ‘B’. The suppression of the safety warnings by attempts to kidnap and murder the author of those warnings led directly to the deaths of the passengers and crew of Flight IX-812.   Moreover, Air India and Boeing Company officials did not act alone in their attempts to kidnap and murder the Boeing Instructor Pilot and thereby suppress safety warnings and court evidence.  They acted in conspiracy with US Government officials led by President Bush, whose aims were likewise to suppress court evidence of criminal wrongdoing in Supreme Court case no. 05-140.  Culpability in the abortive kidnap and murder attempts and ongoing assassination plot is shared by all co-conspirators who assisted the troika of Air India, Boeing, and President Bush (via agents) to suppress important flight safety warnings and court evidence.  Likewise, culpability in the murder of the 158 people who died on Flight IX812 is shared by all co-conspirators in that premeditated design to maliciously effect the death of someone other than those persons who were killed.  These criminal acts are more fully described in the Dossier of Crimes, Volume III, Chapter 42.2.3, and constitute murder in the first degree. (Access ‘Murder Charges’ in the  link below). Having caused the deaths of the passengers and crew of Flight IX-812, Air India, Boeing Company, and US Government officials implicated (and their co-conspirators), violated the following laws:  

The domestic terrorism and murder described above proliferated beyond the borders of America and infiltrated the international arena in terms of the countries and organizations in which the perpetrators operate and enjoy asylum. A number of officials from international organizations have become embroiled in the plot by actively conspiring with and providing safe haven and passage, and material support, to the group of domestic terrorists from the United States. International officials include officers from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), from the European Union and European governments, from the United Nations (UN), and officials from the Indian Supreme Court. Their criminal acts violate the laws on international terrorism and murder:

Charges of terrorism involving US government officials, filed in the US District Court for Rhode Island, were simply sealed and placed in ‘lock up’, concealed from public scrutiny, without addressing the threat to public safety.

On January 10, 2010, an ‘Affidavit of Complaining Witness / Criminal Complaint’ regarding the aforementioned ‘Domestic Terrorism Plot’ was filed with the judges of the US District Court of Virginia, with requests to arrest the criminals and to terminate their plans to commit further acts of violence. On January 15, 2010, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia opened a civil case titled “In re Anthony Keyter”, in order to address (or rather, not address) the domestic terrorism plot as a civil matter and not a criminal matter. In continuance and furtherance of the corrupt US Government policy to protect law-breaking officials from prosecution and to secure their impunity, on January 19, 2010, District Judge Brinkema summarily and corruptly closed the file under false and misleading pretext. (Access document below). A Motion for Rehearing was filed on February 8, 2010, to protest the incorrect filing, the court’s deception, and the illegal closure. The Motion for Rehearing was denied on February 19, 2010. The case was appealed to the 4th Circuit Appeals Court and was again corruptly dismissed on May 11, 2010, without addressing the criminal charges.

Three related cases were filed in the US District Court of Delaware pertaining to the terrorism and murder case:

1. Case no. 08-97, concerning the first two kidnap and murder attempts upon a Supreme Court litigant and eyewitness to the criminal activity of US Government officials. (2/12/08).
2. Case no. 10- 36, concerning domestic terrorism. (1/14/10)
3. Case no. 10-802, concerning international terrorism and the murder of 158 people. (9/13/10).

In each case the US District Court for Delaware corruptly opened a civil case to facilitate easy dismissal of the criminal complaints regarding domestic terrorism and murder.  In each case the Court Judges were requested to correct and change the designation of the civil cases to that of criminal cases; to appoint a prosecutor; and to provide ‘due process and protection of the laws’, and to deal with the criminal offenses according to the statutes 18USC3041, 18USC 3046, and 18USC 3060.  However, each case was corruptly dismissed as a civil case without addressing the crimes – the latter two cases being illegally dismissed by Judge Sue Robinson as a criminal defendant in the very cases she dismissed.  In turn, each case was appealed to the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court and the US Supreme Court with the same requests.  The 3rd Circuit Court upheld the illegal dismissal by the District Judge come criminal defendant.  The US Supreme Court simply failed to file or docket the cases and in that way concealed them from public scrutiny.   

Throughout the judicial misconduct of the second and third cases, the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the US Supreme Court, Members of Congress, and President Obama and his Cabinet, were kept fully informed of the lawlessness, and were requested to deal with the anarchy within the judicial system – to no avail. (See ‘Selected Correspondence’ below).  The three branches of United States Government have conspired together to obstruct justice, deny constitutional rights to due process and protection of the laws, and to render criminal assistance to the perpetrators.  

Selected Documents in Delaware Case no. 8-97
For a summary and for selected documents in this criminal case against President Bush, Justice Roberts, Attorney General Gonzales, and FBI Director Mueller, follow link to Case no. 08-97.